Legal Opinion

Gladding v. Langrall, Muir & Noppinger

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 19, 1977No. 998, September Term, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.

The interesting facts of this case are overshadowed by a procedural consequence which will compel reversal. The facts are simply that the accounting firm of Langrall, Muir & Noppinger (Langrall) recovered a $30,639 judgment in the Superior Court of Baltimore City against appellants Harry L. and Virginia L. Gladding (Gladdings) for some 17 hours of accounting work. Langrall’s total fee of $40,639 1 represented an amount that had been contingent upon whatever sum was saved by its joint effort with the law firm of Venable, Baetjer and Howard in protesting an assessment of approximately…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. A. S. Abell Co. v. SkeenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Mutual Benefit Society of Baltimore, Inc. v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Madore v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Eshelman Motors Corp. Ex Rel. Ottenheimer v. ScheftelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langrall, Muir & Noppinger v. GladdingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Nocera v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Brown v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Langrall, Muir & Noppinger v. GladdingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Langrall, Muir & Noppinger v. GladdingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API