Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur Vesey
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 14, 2005No. 04-1026PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Arthur Vesey appeals from the district court’s 2 denial of his motion for new trial. We affirm.
I
Vesey originally was charged with four counts of distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). After his first trial resulted in a hung jury, Vesey was retried and was convicted on three counts and acquitted on one count. We reversed that conviction and remanded for a third trial, holding that Vesey had been prejudiced by the district court’s denial of a continuance at the second trial. United States v. Vesey, 330 F.3d 1070 (8th Cir.2003).
Following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Erick Arias CamposCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Raydell Lacey, Also Known as Lacey, Also Known as Camile, Also Known as Raydell Laye Lacey, Also Known as Raydell F. LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Roy Jones, Christopher Gracier, Kirk Maeder, Ronald Cichowski, Austin Dehaas, Harvey Hobby v. Tek Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Bennie JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Santano Coronel-Quintana, A/K/A Santana Coronel-Quintana, United States of America v. Inocencio CoronelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Mandy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. SparkmanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2006
- United States v. Milton HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009