Legal Opinion
Ripley v. Sutherland
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 7, 1930No. 4924PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District sustaining a motion to dismiss the bill filed by the next of kin of Baroness Mary Eliza Caldwell von Zedtwitz; except her son, Waldemar Conrad von Zedtwitz. The bill was filed under section 9 of the Trading with the Enemy Act (40 Stat. 411, 419), as amended by the aet of June 5, 1920 (41 Stat. 977), 50 USCA Appendix § 9.
Under the will of Baroness von Zedtwitz real estate in Kentucky, New York, and Rhode Island was devised to her son, Waldemar Conrad von Zedtwitz, an alien, and during the World War an enemy of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fairfax's v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Techt v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Doe Ex Dem. Governeur's Heirs v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Phillips v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Von Zedtwitz v. SutherlandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pavlick v. Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954