Legal Opinion

Quintana v. Bravo

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2013No. Docket 33,350PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHÁVEZ, Justice.

{1} Respondents the State of New Mexico and Erasmo Bravo appeal the district court’s grant of Petitioner George Quintana’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The district court granted the petition based exclusively on the allegations it contained and on those in Quintana’s amended petition, together with a supporting affidavit from one of Quintana’s trial counsel admitting to being ineffective in her representation of him. The district court’s rationale for this unorthodox decision was Respondents’ failure to timely file a response to the amended petition and their…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Doyle A. Jones v. The Honorable Terry L. Shell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Quintana v. MulheronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API