Marshall v. Baynes
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to judgment of circuit court of city of Danville, rendered May lOth, 1891, in an action of ejectment, wherein the heirs of Mary Arnett, deceased, were plaintiffs and the plaintiff in error, Paul Marshall, was defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.
The case, so far as it is necessary to state it here, is as follows :
In 1840 one Mai’y Arnett, the then wife of Joseph Arnett, brought a suit for divorce from bed and board against her said husband on account of cruelty and abuse, driving her from home, and putting her in fear of bodily injury.
The said Joseph Arnett answered, denying cruelty, and charging infidelity upon his wife.
During the pendency of this suit the parties thereto — plaintiff' and defendant — after taking their evidence, in the form of depositions, on the 15th day of May, 1840, entered into an agreement in writing to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dugger's Children v. DuggerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Alvey v. CahoonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
3Cited by10 opinions
- Givens v. GivensSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Fisher v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Charles v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
- Charles v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
- Davis' Widow v. Davis' CreditorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.