Commonwealth v. Hall
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN der VOORT, Judge:
Appellant was found guilty, after a jury trial, on robbery, assault and conspiracy charges. After the denial of post-trial motions, and sentencing, he appeals to this Court, raising several claims of error.
First, appellant contends that he was entitled to an order declaring a mistrial after an officer, in testifying about the comparison of a fingerprint found at the crime scene with the appellant’s fingerprints, made reference to the source of the appellant’s fingerprints “. . .on the BCI Rap Sheet”. It is argued that such a statement imparted the inference to the jury…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KahleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GilliardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. RhemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. RoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987