Chelsea Sav. Bank v. City of Ironwood
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree dis- • missing the bill of the appellants (complainants below). The case arose out of the following facts: On February 24, 1893, an act was passed to reincorporate the city of Ironwood, Mich. (Roc. Acts Mich. 1893, No. 235, p. 36), under which a new council was to be elected April 3, 1893. The act provided that the new city should succeed to the debts and liabilities of the old. The old council, which was continued in office until the new should be elected, by resolution submitted to the electors on April 3, 1893, the question whether…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Parkersburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Phelan v. Middle States Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Luther v. WheelerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Gulf Life Insurance v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Vincennes Bridge Co. v. Board of County Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Eaton v. Shiawassee CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.