Legal Opinion

Beardsley v. Irving

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action to recover damages for breach of warranty in the sale of a horse, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Bennett, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $85, and appeal by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.

This is an action brought to recover damages for the breach of an alleged warranty as to the soundness of a horse. The plaintiff obtained a verdict, and the defendant in his appeal to this court has made several assignments of error relating to the charge of the court and its rulings upon evidence.

By his second assignment of error the defendant claims to have been aggrieved because the court charged as follows: “Now it is necessary that there should be a valid contract, and as you know, and as I charge you, a contract made upon Sunday is not, in this State, a valid contract, and I speak of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  2. Sturdevant's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Jacobs v. Healey Ford-Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  4. Holmes v. McLeanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
  5. Old Lyme Associates Corp. v. Zoning CommissionPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API