Legal Opinion

Syphurs v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1925No. 6 Div. 662PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition laws, by having liquors in his possession, etc., and appeals.

There is no merit in the contention of appellant that the court trying the defendant did not have jurisdiction. Willis Dabbs v. State, 20 Ala. App. 638, 104 So. 684.

Some officers intercepted a ear on a public highway, within the jurisdiction of the court, in which defendant was riding, and which he stated he owned. In the car at the time was defendant’s son, who was driving it, the defendant, and one Morton. Defendant-was on the front seat, by his son’s side, and the son had a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dabbs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Syphurs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API