Legal Opinion
Cabot Corp. v. Yamulla Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 19, 2000No. CIV.A. 3:CV-96-0899PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAPUTO, District Judge.
Before me is the Motion to Compel Testimony (doc. 200) filed by the defendants seeking to compel the testimony of Karen Morris-sey, plaintiffs Rule 30(b)(6) designee, and to sanction plaintiffs refusal to permit her to answer questions at her deposition. Because I choose to follow King v. Pratt & Whitney, 161 F.R.D. 475 (S.D.Fla.1995), the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
On August 6, 1999, a notice pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) was served on plaintiff. The notice is as follows:
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6), Plaintiff Cabot…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- King v. Pratt & WhitneyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
- Paparelli v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Overseas Private Investment Corp. v. MandelbaumDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Hooker v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Crawford v. George & Lynch, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.