Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 22, 1995No. 93-2471-CIVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HIGHSMITH, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the following motions:(1) Plaintiff Ruben E. Garcia’s motion for summary judgment as to both defendants (D.E. #48);(2) Defendant Omaha Property and Casualty Insurance Company’s (“Omaha”) cross-motion for summary judgment (D.E. # 60); and(3) Defendant Tanenbaum-Harber Company’s (“Tanenbaum”) cross-motion for summary judgment (D.E. # 65).

For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Garcia’s motion for summary judgment and grants Omaha’s and Tanenbaum’s cross motions for summary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carneiro Da Cunha v. Standard Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. TAF, LLC v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
  3. Town of Kirkwood v. RitterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Garcia v. Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API