Legal Opinion

State v. Navy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 11, 2010No. 26759PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

Respondent was convicted of homicide by child abuse in the suffocation death of his almost two year old son and received a twenty year sentence. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed, holding “the trial court erred in admitting [respondent’s] voluntary oral statement and the second and third written statements.” State v. Navy, 370 S.C. 398, 635 S.E.2d 549 (Ct.App.2006). We granted the State’s petition for certiorari, and now affirm the decision to the extent it holds the second and third written statements are inadmissible under Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. NavyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. MedleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API