Legal Opinion

In Re: Motion to Compel Compliance With Subpoena Directed to Department of Veteran Affairs

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 28, 2009No. Misc. No. 2008-0525Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re: Motion to Compel Compliance ) with Subpoena Direct to Department ) of Veterans Affairs ) ) BURLODGE LIMITED, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Misc. Action No. 08-525 (CKK/JMF) ) STANDEX INTERNATIONAL CORP. and ) DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ) ) Respondents. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Currently before the court is a Motion to Compel Compliance with a subpoena, pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed by Burlodge Limited. Motion of Burlodge Limited for an Order Compelling the Department of Veterans Affairs to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API