Legal Opinion

I.A. Construction Corp. v. Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1991No. Nos. 1040 and 1100 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Senior Judge.

I.A. Construction Corp. (I.A.), individually and on behalf of H. Miniscalco & Sons, Inc. (Miniscalco), Miniscalco, individually, and the Department of Transportation (DOT) have filed cross-appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Claims (Board) which ordered DOT to pay damages to both I.A. and Miniscalco; the damages awarded were less than the amount sought by I.A. and Miniscalco.

I.A. was the low bidder on a project to reconstruct and improve the Platt Bridge in Philadelphia. I.A. subcontracted with Miniscalco to perform work which is at issue in this litigation.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Acchione and Canuso v. COM., DEPT. OF TR.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. Trumbull Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. G. Cullen Construction, Inc. v. State System of Higher EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Green Construction Co. v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Department of Transportation v. Herbert R. Imbt, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation v. James D. Morrissey, Inc. ex rel. W.P. Dickerson & Son, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API