Legal Opinion

Evans v. Life Insurance Company of North America

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided June 7, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00075Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION HEATH EVANS, ] ] Plaintiff, ] ] v. ] Case No.: 2:22-cv-00075-ACA ] LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ] OF NORTH AMERICA, ] ] Defendant. ] MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Heath Evans was injured while working as a wireline operator for Schlumberger Technology Corporation and received long-term disability benefits from Schlumberger’s ERISA benefits plan (the “Plan”) for years. Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”) is the Plan administrator. In 2020, after a review of Mr. Evans’s entitlement to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Blankenship v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Glazer v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1467, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1397 Frances W. Horton, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Frances W. Horton, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Paramore v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API