Legal Opinion

Trambley v. Luterman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1891No. 390PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal, from a judgment for complainants, from the Fourth Judicial District Court, San Miguel County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, C. J.

Water right: elementon* This suit was brought by Peter and Ernestine Trambley for the purpose of restraining appellant, the defendant in the court below, from diverting the waters out of the artificial race or ditch of appellees situate on the Gallinas river, near Las Vegas, in San Miguel county, to a wool and pelt cleaning establishment of the defendant, thereby depriving complainants of enough of water with which to operate their mill. It appears from the record that in 1849, Rafael Garcia erected a grist mill on the Gallinas river at the town of Las Vegas, San Miguel county. The machinery…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Kidd v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Stein v. BurdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. McDonald v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Hill v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Martinez v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Trigg v. AllemandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. BallardDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1960
  5. Carangelo v. Albuquerque-Bernalillo Cnty. Water Util. Auth.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API