Legal Opinion
Flournoy v. Porter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 7, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.), dated September 19, 1990, as set a liberal visitation schedule for the father pursu*466ant to a stipulation of the parties, and which directed "that neither party may remove the child more than 100 miles from New York City without the prior written consent of the other party or an order of this court or another court of competent jurisdiction authorizing said relocation”.
Ordered that the order is modified, on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Freidus v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Trump v. TrumpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Reinfurt v. ReinfurtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In re the Estate of NicastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Heinzman v. ZeilinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Falchenberg v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Dwyer v. De La TorreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Fialkowski v. GilroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Laeyt v. LaeytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Lazich v. LazichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996