Legal Opinion

800 S. Wells Commercial LLC v. Gouletas (In re Gouletas)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 25, 2018No. Case No. 16bk01335; Adv. No. 16ap00141PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The Defendant's Affirmative Defense fails on a number of levels.7 Statutes of limitation do not have the legal effect supposed by the Defendant. They do not negate parties' rights, but rather deny legal recourse on such rights in very specific circumstances. Further, even if a statute of limitations has run on a security agreement or mortgage, under Illinois law, those instruments remain good and enforceable so long as the underlying debt also remains enforceable and unsatisfied.

The court will consider each of these issues, in turn.

A. Statutes of Limitation Do Not Extinguish Causes of Action

Re…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Midland Funding, LLC v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Gratiot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  4. Newland v. MarshIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Keener v. CrullIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re: Howard I. Cooper v. Howard CooperUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API