800 S. Wells Commercial LLC v. Gouletas (In re Gouletas)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
The Defendant's Affirmative Defense fails on a number of levels.7 Statutes of limitation do not have the legal effect supposed by the Defendant. They do not negate parties' rights, but rather deny legal recourse on such rights in very specific circumstances. Further, even if a statute of limitations has run on a security agreement or mortgage, under Illinois law, those instruments remain good and enforceable so long as the underlying debt also remains enforceable and unsatisfied.
The court will consider each of these issues, in turn.
A. Statutes of Limitation Do Not Extinguish Causes of Action
Re…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Midland Funding, LLC v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Gratiot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Newland v. MarshIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Keener v. CrullIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: Howard I. Cooper v. Howard CooperUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025