Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. C. R. Wilson Body Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAYER, District Judge.
This appeal involves the validity and infringement of the following United States letters patent: (1) 1,143,635, issued June 22, 1915, to J. Ledwinka, of which claims 3, 9, 10, 14, 19, 22, 23 to 31, inclusive, and 38 and 39 were in issue and were all held below to be invalid for lack of invention and patentable novelty; the subject-matter of the patented invention being an all steel or metal automobile body, consisting of a skeleton frame and shell integrally joined together. (2) 1,275,274, issued to J. Ledwinka August 23, 1918, of which claims 1, 2, 11, 14 and 15…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- City and County of Denver v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- PPS, Inc. v. Jewelry Sales Representatives, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Motor Wheel Corp. v. Rubsam Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Stubbs v. Fulton Nat. Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Anderson v. AkersDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1934
- Young v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.