Legal Opinion

Carle v. International Clay Products Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 21, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The defendant was duly dissolved under the General Corporation Law. (22 Del. Laws, c. 167). Upon the dissolution of a corporation, the directors were formerly constituted *167by Sections 41 and 42 of the act trustees with certain powers for the purpose of settling the corporation’s affairs. The Chancellor was authorized by Section 43 upon the application of a creditor or stockholder to continue the directors of dissolved corporations as trustees, or to appoint a receiver. But a receiver would not be appointed under Section 43 to take over from the director-trustees the duty of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Maxwell Motor Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
  2. Cahall v. LoflandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Pulp Equipment Co. v. St. Regis Kraft Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  2. Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. RedwineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Arn v. Bradshaw Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  4. Lehrich v. Sixth Avenue Bancorporation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Garland v. Independent Oil & Gas Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API