Legal Opinion

Klie v. Hollstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

This is an action on a contract for brokers’ commission for the procurement of a lessee for a factory property.

The defendants, in their answer, denied tire existence of the contract, and as a further defence set up that the alleged contract was not enforceable because not in writing.

At the trial the evidence, while conflicting, nevertheless permitted the jury, if they saw fit, to find the following facts:: The plaintiffs were real estate brokers. The defendants were owners of a factory property. They authorized the plaintiffs to lease the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zexter v. CerroneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  2. A.S. Goldstein Co. v. Bloomfield Plaza AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  3. Ceccomancino v. D'OnofrioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Feist & Feist Realty v. DocksideNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  5. B. B. Miller & Co. v. WoolseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API