Legal Opinion

In re Claim of Albertson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Desmond.

Two separate but related questions arise in this consolidated proceeding. We are first to decide whether, on the theory that his employment by the Communist Parties (N. Y. and U. S. A.) was not “ covered employment ”, respondent Albertson is ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits. Second, we must determine whether the Industrial Commissioner was legally justified in suspending the registration of the Communist Parties themselves as “ employers ” within the meaning of the Unemployment Insurance Law.

We agree with the Appellate Division that Albertson is not to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. East New York Savings Bank v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Lerner v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. East New York Savings Bank v. HahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Matter of Clarke v. Town of RussiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Communist Party, USA v. CatherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Blawis v. BolinDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1973
  3. Blawis v. BolinDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API