Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Kaitlyn P.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2010No. 35450PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Per curiam

This ease is before this Court upon appeal of a September 24, 2009, order of the Circuit Court of Raleigh County which granted a six-month post-adjudicatory improvement period to the appellees and respondents below, Samantha and Christopher C. 1 In this appeal, the appellant and petitioner below, the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (hereinafter “DHHR”), contends that the circuit court erred by granting the improvement period because neither parent has identified who abused their son, Ryan C., nor even admitted that he was abused, despite uncontroverted medical evidence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Interest of Tiffany Marie S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In Re Katie S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re Jeffrey R.L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Christina L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Emily B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. In Re: Timber M. & Reuben M.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In Re M.M., B.M., C.Z., and C.SWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re S.W.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In re A.P.-1, A.P.-2, A.P.-3West Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In re Isaiah A.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API