Legal Opinion

Eldridge v. Isbrandtsen Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1950No. 197 of 1949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

This case is before us on libellants’ exceptions to set-off contained in respondent’s answer and a motion for summary judgment in favor of libellants. The pleadings to date consist of a libel in personam, an answer to libel and complaint incorporating respondent’s “defense and set-off”, libel-lants’ exceptions to set-off and motion for summary judgment, in which pleading and *719in support of their motion, libellants made certain exceptive allegations and respondent’s exceptions to exceptive allegations.

The facts briefly are as follows. Libel-lants are seamen engaged by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. United States v. 422 Casks of WineSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. Suspine v. Compania Transatlantica Centroamericana, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Johnson v. Isbrandtsen Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. North American Smelting Co. v. Moller S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Robert Roeder v. Alcoa Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Cuban Atlantic Sugar Sales Corp. v. Marine Midland Trust Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API