Eldridge v. Isbrandtsen Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CLARY, District Judge.
This case is before us on libellants’ exceptions to set-off contained in respondent’s answer and a motion for summary judgment in favor of libellants. The pleadings to date consist of a libel in personam, an answer to libel and complaint incorporating respondent’s “defense and set-off”, libel-lants’ exceptions to set-off and motion for summary judgment, in which pleading and *719in support of their motion, libellants made certain exceptive allegations and respondent’s exceptions to exceptive allegations.
The facts briefly are as follows. Libel-lants are seamen engaged by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- United States v. 422 Casks of WineSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Suspine v. Compania Transatlantica Centroamericana, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Johnson v. Isbrandtsen Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- North American Smelting Co. v. Moller S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Robert Roeder v. Alcoa Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Cuban Atlantic Sugar Sales Corp. v. Marine Midland Trust Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.