Legal Opinion

Stanswsky v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1931No. 20611. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

On October 12, 1929, Eva Stanswsky, widow of George Stanswsky, filed a petition with the Industrial Commission asking for the entry of an order that the unpaid balance due Stanswsky under an award entered July 23, 1929, be paid to her in accordance with the provisions of subsection 19 of paragraph (e) of section 8 of the Workmen’s Compensation act, which became effective July 1, 1929. A hearing was had upon this petition under an agreed statement of facts. It was agreed that Stanswsky died on September 3, 1929, that the petitioner was the only surviving dependent and beneficiary, and that on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Havill v. HavillIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Harraz v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Theodosis v. Keeshin Motor Express Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  4. Lewis v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Lancaster v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API