Legal Opinion
Feeney v. AT & E, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 29, 2006No. 06-1500PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.
In the fall of 2004, Kenneth Mitán reached an agreement with Doug and Doreen Feeney to buy the Feeneys’ company, Prime-Line, Inc. Under the stock purchase agreement, Mitan’s company, AT & E, Inc., purchased from the Feeneys all 300 outstanding shares of Prime-Line stock. When Mitán failed to make certain payments required by the agreement, the Feeneys filed an action against Mitán in the district court, claiming fraud in the inducement, conversion, and breach of contract. The complaint sought relief in the form of an injunction preventing the defendants from “further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Margaret Lowry, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Progress Rail Services Corporation, an Alabama CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Cardiac Thoracic & Vascular Surgery, P.A. Profit Sharing Trust v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rickey Giles v. St Luke's Northland-SmithvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Feeney v. at Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- FTC v. American Screening, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- Christianson v. KlangDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Fellows v. Minnesota Association of Professional EmployeesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.