Legal Opinion

State v. Hummert

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1997No. CR-95-0100-PRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

Steven Henry Hummert (Defendant) appealed his convictions for kidnaping, sexual assault, sexual abuse, and aggravated assault. Defendant claimed the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of DNA testing. Following State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 549, 858 P.2d 1152 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046, 114 S.Ct. 1578, 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994), the court of appeals held that experts can only testify a DNA match means the defendant cannot be excluded as the donor of the sample. State v. Hummert, 183 Ariz. 484, 905 P.2d 493 (App.1995). Furthermore, the court of appeals found that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. Van AdamsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Fugate v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Logerquist v. McVeyArizona Supreme Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API