Crain v. Daniel
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
'.-.Sutton,- C., J.
(-After stating the foregoing facts.) The defendants in error moved to dismiss the writ of error pending'in this court because no parties were named therein, as defendants in' error. In the bill of exceptions no parties were named as. defendants in error, and the style of the case in the loiver. court is shown as Alton Daniel et al. v. J. H. Crain. Notice, etc., before presentation of the bill of exceptions, required by the provisions.of .the Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-9.08.1, was waived by - “Wyatt and Morgan, by Lewis R. Morgan, attorney for plaintiff,” and service of the-…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Patrick v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Bullard v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Hill v. KitchensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Steed v. Federal National Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Sanders v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Stevens v. WayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Tyson v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Kenner v. KennerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.