Legal Opinion

Genet v. Davenport

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was a motion to dismiss an appeal. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The plaintiff sought to establish an interest in and title to two parcels of land, the one containing 234 acres, and the other fifty-two acres, and to compel a specific performance of a contract for the sale to the defendant Ketchum of 110 acres, embracing a part of both tracts. The title to both parcels had become vested in the defendant Davenport; that to the larger tract by purchase at a public sale, on the foreclosure of a mortgage to the State, and to the smaller, by deed from Ketchum. The plaintiff had been the owner in fee of the large parcel, and claimed that the sale on foreclosure…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . Van SyckelNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Murphy v. . SpauldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Frantz v. AutrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Commissioners of Johnson County v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Vaught v. Charleston Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API