Legal Opinion
South Brooklyn Railway Co. v. Schayes
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
This action is for an injunction. The plaintiff owns and operates at Coney Island a railway which extends from Stillwell avenue to Sea Gate. The defendants own taxicabs which they operate upon Mermaid avenue, which runs parallel to the plaintiff’s railroad and only a few hundred feet from it. It is admitted that none of the defendants has obtained the consent of the Transit Commission or of the local authorities, as that term is defined in the Railroad Law of the State. Each of the defendants’ automobiles has been licensed as a taxicab and it is defendants’ contention that no other consents…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brooklyn City Railroad v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- The Brooklyn City Railroad Company v. . WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- People ex rel. Weatherwax v. WattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Public Service Commission v. HurtganNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- New York State Railways v. Monroe Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tilton v. Model Taxi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Palmer v. Royal Cadillac Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Tilton v. Model Taxi Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1938