Legal Opinion

W.C.R. v. D.A.L.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 6, 2009No. 2071167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

D.A.L. and D.L. adopted W.T.R. (“the child”) in March 2001. The adoptive parents, who are also the child’s maternal grandparents, allowed W.C.R., the child’s biological father, to maintain a relationship and visit with the child until early 2006, when the biological father filed a complaint in the Marion Juvenile Court (“the juvenile court”) alleging that the child was dependent. The adoptive parents moved the juvenile court for a summary judgment, arguing that the biological father lacked standing to prosecute the dependency action. The juvenile court entered a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. TEE JAYS MFG. CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Rudd v. RuddCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. R.M. v. J.D.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. H.E.H. v. K.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. W.C.R. v. D.A.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holifield v. LambertCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. D.S. and B.S. v. R.S. and Br.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2026
  3. R.S. and Br.S. v. D.S. and B.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API