United States v. Bailey
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COOK, Senior Judge:
Appellant was charged under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. § 934) with one specification alleging the wrongful possession, one specification combining an allegation of wrongful transfer and sale, and one specification alleging the wrongful introduction onto a military post, of marijuana. In spite of his pleas he was convicted of all three criminal acts at a bench trial, general court-martial.
As the trial was conducted on 25 March 1976, we are not concerned in this case with the sentencing problem addressed in United States v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CourtneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. MyersU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. WatkinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. SpringerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. LoewenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982