Legal Opinion

Timble v. Russell

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to recover possession of real property.. Motion to compel plaintiff to reply to answer.

1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.

The action is to recover the possession of real property. The answer sets up as separate defenses: That the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue for the reason that he is a minor; and, further, that before the commencement of this action the plaintiff became seized of the equity of redemption in the premises subject to a certain mortgage which was foreclosed; that Joseph Timble (the name of the 'plaintiff herein) was a defendant in the foreclosure, and that the defendants in this action purchased the property at the foreclosure sale. A motion is made to compel the plaintiff to reply to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brinkerhoff v. BrinkerhoffNew York Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evelyn Goldsmith Home for Crippled Children, Inc. v. Island Park Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API