Legal Opinion

Nestor v. City of Fall River

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1903PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of tort for personal injuries from-an alleged defect in the sidewalk of a public street in the defendant city. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and the case is here on the defendant’s exceptions. If the plaintiff is entitled to recover at all there is also a further question affecting the amount, namely, the' right of the plaintiff or her father to recover for medical expenses.

The defect complained of was a loose and rotten root of a tree which stood in the sidewalk, and which the testimony tended to show had stood there for sixty years or upwards and which therefore…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Raymond v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Oulighan v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Erickson v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Wilson v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Cormier v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. City of Boston v. NielsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API