Legal Opinion

Claim of Smith v. Rome Cable Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 27, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerlihy, J.

Appeal by the self-insured employer from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board granting a schedule award to the claimant. The appellant first argues that there is no connection between the accident of September 18, 1963 and the schedule loss of 7%% of the claimant’s left arm. Dr. Gifford testified that, considering the facts of the accident, the defects which he found equivalent to a loss of 7%% of the use of the left arm were caused by the accident. His testimony as to his reason for such a finding was sufficiently detailed to' show a medical basis for his finding of a loss of use.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Marhoffer v. . MarhofferNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Matter of Slawinski v. J.H. Williams Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Claim of Slawinski v. J. H. Williams & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Fortuna v. Pfizer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Claim of Harvey v. Marsaw & Marsaw, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API