Legal Opinion

Gay v. Hudson River Electric Power Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

Decided September 16, 1911Published

In Equity. Suit by Eben H. Gay and Joseph W. Jackson against the Hudson River Electric Power Company, the Hudson River Water Power Company, and others. On application for order confirming sale. Application on order to show cause for an order confirming the sale of the properties of six of the defendant corporations made pursuant to a consolidated decree of foreclosure directed by this court in foreclosures allowed by this court.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

On or about November 1, 1908, this court in the above-entitled action appointed George W. Dunn, Milton De Lano, and Charles W. Andrews, receivers of the properties of the eight defendant corporations, same being then under one management and con'■trol, with directions to keep the properties, accounts, etc., of such corporations separate so far as possible. The said receivers qualified-and have been in the possession, control, and management of such corporate properties since. On application to the court, permission was granted to foreclose certain mortgages on such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. In Re ClaasenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Draper v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Catlett v. BrodieSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API