Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1974PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is a negligence and strict liability action in which the plaintiff seeks to recover from the retailer and installer of a tire for injuries suffered in an automobile accident. The trial court refused to submit the issue of strict liability to the jury, and the jury returned a verdict for the defendants on the issue of negligence. The plaintiff appeals.

In July 1971 plaintiff’s husband purchased four tires from defendant Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated. Two of these tires were mounted on the rear wheels, with the mounting included in the price of the tires. On November 16, 1971, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newmark v. Gimbel's IncorporatedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Worrell v. BarnesNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Carpenter v. Best's Apparel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Hoffman v. Simplot Aviation, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API