Legal Opinion

Straus Frank Company v. Brown

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 9, 1964No. 47098PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

Plaintiff, Straus Frank Company, operating auto parts and supply stores in the city of Lake Charles and the town of Sulphur under the trade name of “Lake Auto Parts”, sought damages and an injunction to restrain the defendant, Curlin Brown, from the use of the trade name “Lake Auto Supply” in the conduct of his business of selling auto parts and supplies in the town of Lake Arthur. The trial court denied plaintiff’s demands and dismissed its suit. . Tlie Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, reversed'the trial court, denied the claim for damages and granted plaintiff the injunction…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Orleans Checker Cabs, Inc. v. MumphreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  2. Home Beverage Service v. BaasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  3. Yellow Cab Co. of New Orleans, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Albrecht v. Del BondioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  5. Marcev v. MandichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. The Vision Center, Cross v. Opticks, Inc., Will Ross, Inc. And G. D. Searle & Co., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Falcon Rice Mill, Inc. v. Community Rice Mill, Inc. And James VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Gulf Coast Bank v. Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  4. Barrera v. CiolinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Boogie Kings v. GuilloryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API