Legal Opinion

United States v. Illfelder & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 28, 1919No. 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 41992. [Oral argument Oct. 29, 1918, by Mr. Hanson.]

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise in question in this case consists of a combination penholder fitted with a pencil at one end and a pen at the other.

The collector in assessing duty segregated the pen from the combination penholder and assessed, duty on the latter under paragraph 157 and on the pen at the rate provided for in paragraph 156.

*41The Board of General Appraisers, both on the original hearing and on a rehearing, granted at the instance of the Government, held that the collector was in error in thns assessing duty, and sustained the protest, claiming that the combination penholder was dutiable as an…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bentkamp v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. Floral Arts Studio v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. United States v. Massce & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  4. Werner G. Smith Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API