Legal Opinion
United States v. Cioffi
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 2, 2009No. 1:08-cv-00415PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BLOCK, Senior District Judge:
Defendant Matthew Tannin (“Tannin”) is charged -with conspiracy, securities fraud and wire fraud in connection with two hedge funds he managed for Bear Stearns Asset Management (“BSAM”). He moves to suppress evidence seized from his personal email account on the ground that the warrant authorizing the seizure did not comply with the Warrants Clause of the Fourth Amendment. 1 For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
I
On July 7, 2009, FBI Special Agent Mark Munster (“Munster”) applied to Magistrate Judge Cheryl Poliak for a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. AliDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. MetterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. ZemlyanskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re a Warrant for All Content & Other Information Associated with the Email Account xxxxxxx@ Gmail.com Maintained at Premises Controlled by Google, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.