Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Hough

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Crawford District Court. Replevin brought by Hough against Wolf, agent for the Mo. R., Ft. Scott & Gulf Rid. Co., to recover the possession of certain goods of the alleged value of $75, and for $25 damages for the wrongful detention thereof. Trial at the January Term, 1879, of the district court, and verdict and judgment for plaintiff. New trial denied, and the Railroad Company brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This is one of those petty cases that never should come to this court, and one which reluctantly we are compelled to reverse. The action was replevin; the defense a carrier’s lien, and the verdict and judgment against the lien. The facts are these: The goods were shipped from Roselle, Illinois, to Girard, Kansas. The M. R., Ft. Scott & G. Rid. Co., whose agent the plaintiff in error was, carried *660the goods over its road from Kansas City to Girard. A portion only of its charges therefor was paid, and for the balance, $1.40, it claimed a lien,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Loewenberg v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. MurrahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Brookhaven Machine Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Moses v. Port Townsend Southern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Glover v. Cape Girardeau & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API