Legal Opinion

Grantham v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 23, 1948No. 14928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

Appellee, A. M. Anderson, sued appellants, Roy Grantham and his wife, Zadie Grantham, in a district court of Wichita County, Texas, alleging as a cause of action damages for the wrongful and fraudulent sale, by appellants, of real estate belonging to appellee, title to which he had placed in appellant, Zadie Grantham, in trust to secure a loan.

The trial was to a jury. Judgment was entered for appellee in the sum of $3844.70 and against appellants, based upon the ju ry’s findings, to-wit: (1) That it was the intention of the parties by virtue of the oral agreement that the deed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Allen v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Faville v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Masterson v. Amarillo Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Clark v. HaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Company v. BockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Powe v. PoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API