Legal Opinion

Auckland v. Lawrence

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1903No. 2337PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the County Court of Otero County.

1Opinion of the CourtGrUNTEH, J.

Action to recover damages through overflow of irrigating ditch; trial to jury; verdict for appellee (plaintiff) for $1.00 damages; judgment in accordance with verdict; therefrom this appeal.

A motion has been filed to dismiss the appeal *292-which, we find unnecessary to decide. We confine the opinion to such assigned errors as are discussed by appellants — Bartholomew v. Yankee, 30 Colo. 361, 70 Pac. 415.

Appellants contend that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. There is substantial evidence to support the judgment; this is a sufficient reason for our declining to disturb it on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brennan Mercantile Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  2. Means v. GotthelfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  3. Bartholomew v. YankeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  4. Gerspach v. BarhyteColorado Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zall Jewelry Co. v. StoddardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API