Legal Opinion
Flowrider Surf, Ltd. v. Pacific Surf Designs, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 30, 2020No. 3:15-cv-01879Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FLOWRIDER SURF, LTD., a Canadian Case No.: 3:15-cv-01879-BEN-BLM corporation; and SURF WAVES, LTD., a 12 company incorporated in the United ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 13 Kingdom, (1) EX PARTE MOTION FOR 14 Plaintiffs, LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY 15 v. TO DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S 16 PACIFIC SURF DESIGNS, INC., a RENEWED MOTION FOR Delaware corporation, 17 ATTORNEY’S FEES Defendant. 18 (2) MOTION TO RE-TAX COSTS 19 [ECF No. 294, 296] 20 21 Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs’ (1) Ex Parte…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Wong v. BelmontesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.