Legal Opinion

Adam E. Murphy v. ERT Medical Officer K. Rodriguez, et al.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 9, 2025No. 7:23-cv-06998Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ADAM E. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. No. 23-CV-6998 (KMK) ERT MEDICAL OFFICER K. ORDER OF DISMISSAL RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants. KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: Adam E. Murphy (“Plaintiff”) brings this Action pro se under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against ERT Officers K. Rodriguez, Pullen, and Prelvukaj, and Orange County (collectively, “Defendants”). (See generally Am. Compl. (Dkt. No. 9).) On May 22, 2025, The Court reopened Plaintiff’s case and gave him an additional thirty days to file a second amended complaint, which the Court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States of America, Ex Rel., Walter M. Drake v. Norden Systems, Inc., and United Technologies CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Lucas v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Herbert E. Theilmann, Administrator of Herbert K. Theilmann v. The Rutland Hospital, Inc., and Dr. Donald D. DingmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Armstrong v. GuccioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API