Legal Opinion

McCormick v. C.E. Thurston & Sons, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 28, 1997No. Civil Action 4:97cv37PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

MacKENZIE, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court pursuant to Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. Plaintiffs argue that neither of the grounds stated in Defendant’s notice of removal properly establish federal jurisdiction over the instant action. After hearing argument in the matter and duly considering the parties’ submissions, this Court agrees. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is hereby GRANTED.

I

This action arose out of the alleged wrongful death of Paul C. Cochran, a former navy officer allegedly exposed to asbestos while serving aboard the USS NIMITZ. As a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. In Re Business Men's Assurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Deborah Ripley v. Foster Wheeler LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
  3. Bartel ex rel. Estate of Bishop v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2014
  4. Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1999
  5. McMahon v. Presidential Airways, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API