Legal Opinion

Calumet Electric St. Ry. Co. v. Lee

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 16, 1900Published

Action on the Case, for personal injuries. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles Gr. Neely, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

Ho complaint is made as to any matter of procedure—the sole ground upon which a reversal of the judgment below is sought being the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Counsel for defendant in error argue that it is the established rule in this State that when there is any competent evidence to support the verdict and there is no error in the manner of conducting the trial, and the jury have been properly instructed, then judgment upon such verdict will not be disturbed upon review. And therefore counsel in effect conclude that the comparative weight of the evidence is here…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peaslee v. GlassIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. StumpsIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Chicago West Division Railway Co. v. ConleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  5. Welch v. HuckinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API