Legal Opinion

Robinson v. McKay

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1951No. 3619Published

1Opinion of the Court

*373OPINION

By the Court,

Eather, J.:

A statement of the factual background of this case is as follows: For many years the plaintiffs, husband and wife, operated certain ranching property situate in Smith Valley, in Lyon County, owning two parcels of land referred to as the “Tidd Place,” consisting of 124 acres, and the “Mann Place,” consisting of 14 acres. Both parcels of land were within the Walker River Irrigation District and subject to assessment for the benefits conferred by the irrigation district.

The two parcels of land, that is the “Tidd Place” and the “Mann Place,” were each separately…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burgess v. HelmNevada Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Levinson v. Home Bank and Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Marks v. RobertiNevada Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API