Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Poland

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1886No. Case No. 2065PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Harrison. Tried below before the Hon. William Stedman, special judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

This action was brought by Mary J. Curtis to obtain partition of a house and lot in the city of Marshall. *512The lot was of the community estate of her father and mother. Her mother died in November, 1876, leaving six children and two grandchildren; and after her death the improvements on the lot were destroyed by fire, but were rebuilt by the father in the year 1878 with his separate means, the greater part of which was obtained from the plaintiff. In January, 1883, her father conveyed to her all his “right, title and interest” in the lot, reserving to himself the…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dakan v. DakanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Burton v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Porter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Gjerstadengen v. HartzellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Broadway v. StoneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API