Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 1978No. B42-243, CA 9597PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In her petition for rehearing on our decision affirming her conviction for resisting arrest and assault, 1 defendant suggests that a portion of our opinion was based upon an incorrect factual premise and should therefore be reconsidered. Specifically, defendant questions that portion of our opinion dealing with her second and third assignments of error. 35 Or App at 211-214. These assignments concerned a question on cross-examination and the admission in evidence of a tape recording made by one of the arresting officers on the evening in question. We said,

"The tape recording was admitted to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. PeasleeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. State v. Van GorderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. PewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Brood v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API